![]() |
Photo: Wen-Chun Fan - CNN |
It’s been a few months since I placed China firmly in my crosshairs. Since then, the evidence continues to portray a mind-boggling debt
bubble, not only in the property and construction markets, but also in
corporations financed by the shadow banking sector.
Initially, I thought the main problem was the property
market but after realising how leveraged the corporate sector is, my attention
turned to the copper, coal and iron industries with connections to the shadow banking
system. My updated thesis is that the overleveraged corporates (specifically
the coal mining, iron ore, copper, cement and property industries) will be the first to
crack causing defaults in the shadow banking system. Loan defaults inevitably
lead to tighter credit conditions and further defaults, falling asset prices
and collateral impairment. The vicious cycle is complete and suddenly the
economy is in free-fall.
There is no question in my mind that the defaults will occur
but what will the policy response be? The Chinese government will respond with
bailouts, debt guarantees and more fiscal stimulus. Despite the financial
firepower that Beijing has, the scale of the problem is so vast that it will
overwhelm the economy before Beijing reacts.
But let’s say that Beijing is successful in preventing a few
defaults initially. The distortion of risk will perversely cause investors and
speculators to pump more funds into bad investment products as any losses
incurred will be recovered via a bailout (increasing moral hazard).
The main catalysts for the China collapse in order of most
likely to least likely are:
- Government inaction (no bailouts) that results in tighter credit conditions or intervention to deliberately depreciate the Yuan (reversing leveraged carry trades)
- Falling commodity prices causing collateral impairment, forcing collateral liquidation which causes further falls in commodities in a self-reinforcing cycle
- Defaults relating to property market speculation occur causing a downturn in the economy and falling demand for commodities
In this post I will provide evidence for the aforementioned conclusions. You can decide for yourself if this is just doomsday permabear talk or if China is on the precipice of the abyss.
Chinese banks and bad loans
The borrowing binge of the last couple of years has seen a
rise in Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) for the largest Chinese banks. Beijing has
tried to clamp down on the leveraged banking sector and the reports of rising
NPLs is seen as a pre-emptive move to mitigate a future surge in NPL ratios
amid rising defaults in 2014.
This raises suspicions that if the largest banks are
reporting rising NPLs, one can only imagine the amount of bad loans in the
opaque shadow banking sector. To illustrate the relative size of the shadow
banking sector, the five largest state owned banks and the 12 largest national
lenders control more than 60% of China’s banking assets with other financial
institutions owning the rest. There is cause for concern with NPLs rose by
28.5bn Yuan in last quarter of 2013.
![]() |
Credit boom continues |
Shadow banking
At the heart of the excessive credit is the shadow banking
system in China. Essentially, the shadow banking system refers to the
unregulated financial intermediaries and the investment trust products they
produce. These trust assets are marketed as “wealth management products”
(WMPs). A good analogy for WMPs is the mortgage backed securities that went
bust during the GFC. But instead of institutions buying these products, it is
small retail investors and instead of mortgages backing these trusts, it is
loans to corporations and local governments. The growth in these trust assets
and WMPs have been enormous to say the least, with growth in the last few years
averaging 40%p.a.
One of the counterpoints put forward by the China bulls is
that the government can just expand credit and bail everyone out. Unfortunately
this creates huge moral hazard and encourages reckless risk taking throughout
the entire system.
Wealth management Products (WMPs) offering double digit
returns are presumed by investors as being guaranteed by the issuers. Avoiding
the default has misleadingly confirmed that presumption leading to that perennial distortion of risk… Ye Olde Moral Hazard.
In a JPM report they conclude, “Avoiding defaults will only
delay or even amplify the problem in the future.” Get ready for the first wave because in the short-term there are a large volume
of WMPs maturing which poses substantial rollover risk.
To summarise, bailing out losing trust products creates
moral hazard and exacerbates the risk of further volatility. The lack of
perceived risk will entice further investment, further inflating the bubble and
worsening the inevitable crash.
Chinese commodity collateralised loans
While the central government is aware of the accumulation of
leverage in the system, the crackdown on lending has driven companies to use
raw commodities such as iron ore, copper and coal as collateral. These schemes increase
the risk on loans by exposing lenders to a fall in commodity prices which will
impair collateral. This creates the dual risk of either loan defaults causing
collateral to be liquidated or commodity prices falling first and the value of
collateral being insufficient, leading to lenders calling for more collateral.
Given the above, the record build-up of iron ore inventory
at Chinese ports is a worrying sign and could precipitate a collapse in
commodity prices:
Already iron ore prices are declining as inventory is at
all-time highs. Adding to the pessimism is falling industrial demand and
speculative activities by commodity traders. There is anecdotal evidence that
commodity importers have been using their inventories as collateral to bet on
Yuan appreciation. Some have even borrowed dollars, converted them to Yuan and
invested the money in “high yielding” accounts.
From SoberLook, “With banks cutting back lending to this
sector and the recent decline in the Yuan, traders are being forced to dump
inventory and that is sending prices lower and causing some mills to close. All
of this points to tighter credit, weaker demand and slower industrial activity
going forward.”
![]() |
Inventory piling up and does not bode well for prices Source: Unknown |
Iron ore prices at new monthly lows Source: Barchart |
China upcoming trust defaults
There have already been reports by the media of potential
trust defaults. The upcoming trust defaults seem to be concentrated in Shanxi province and in the coal mining industry. Repayments may be extended to avoid default in the near
term and Coal mine trusts are most likely to default because coal price has
fallen recently.
![]() |
The maturity wall is fast approaching |
Chinese housing market
Residential property in China’s 70 largest cities is also
coming off the boil. It is still early days but if the fall in property prices
gain momentum, this will dampen the speculative frenzy. A rapidly cooling
property market and falling coal and iron ore prices will compound the
contraction in credit growth as trust products default.
Chinese households have invested vast amounts in property
and are now massively exposed to a housing bubble. China housing prices have
increased substantially with households holding on average 65% of their assets
in real estate and 90% of households already owning a home. Supply is coming to market at a rate of 15mil new units per year.
![]() |
Chinese house prices in a speculative fervour |
Impact on the world
I remember watching an episode of NCIS and the veteran detective saying, “I don’t believe in
coincidence.” There is a link between Chinese capital flows and the US Federal
Reserve’s QE program. We have seen the effect QE tapering on emerging markets (EMs)
as the carry trade unwinds. Tapering will speed up the withdrawal of capital
causing financial conditions in China to tighten. This is relevant because the
Chinese trust sector is partly financed overseas. Low global rates and
expectations of perpetual Yuan appreciation have resulted in higher investment
returns promised by trusts. Part of the debt raised overseas is probably
invested in the trust carry trade. Hong Kong banks are big participants and if
China goes bust, you can expect the Hong Kong banking system and property
prices to come under pressure.
![]() |
Honk Kong financials are heavily exposed to Chinese borrowers |
Yuan leveraged bets
The “managed economy” that China espouses has resulted in
massive speculation in property, commodities and of course the currency. China
has steadily allowed the Yuan to rise and has gradually allowed increasing
volatility over the years. Corporations have taken out derivatives known as
target redemption forward contracts to bet on the increasing currency in what
many have described as the “easy money, no risk, no brainer” trade.
Unfortunately, the government has ended the party in recent weeks with the Yuan
depreciating significantly during a short period of time. While in absolute
terms the move is not dramatic, it does cause the problem of huge losses for
corporates who are exposed to these leveraged derivatives.
To summarise the problem, the longer the currency
depreciates the more losses are sustained. Even if the currency remains below certain
loss thresholds, collateral or margin calls will be used to reduce the risk of
positions for banks. This means corporates will have less cash and will become
more leveraged. You can read in more detail about the derivatives here.
Arguments against a China collapse
Another argument against a major crisis is that China runs a“non-commercial” financial system, that there is no counterparty risk since it’s just one giant state run labyrinth and bailouts will flow at the first
sign of trouble.
Such a system is not immune to shocks and is in fact more fragile
and more susceptible to adverse events. I have already mentioned that avoiding
losses will result in moral hazard and lead to more risk taking and leverage.
Eventually the boom will become too inflationary (as seen in 20%YoY property
price increases) and they will be forced to tighten, which then causes tighter
credit and eventually defaults that further destabilise the system.
The “China is immune view” also emphasises that market
forces deal with problems and governments do not. Loss making decisions are
eventually purged from the market, while they are perpetuated and exacerbated
in a government controlled system.
Picking the top in the market
There’s that old adage in the investing world that the markets can remain irrational longer
than you can remain solvent. This is especially true for bearish investors
and traders calling the top in any bubble. I have previously said I expect Australia to be in recession before 2016 based on many risks including a Chinese financial crisis.
That is still my base case. In making this prediction, I am committing the
cardinal sin of picking the top of the market or trying to time the collapse.
Jim Chanos (runs a short-selling hedge fund) has been predicting the Chinese
collapse since 2009 and five years later it still has not happened! I am happy
to be wrong on timing the crash because I am convinced that it will happen
given all the facts listed above.
Conclusion - warning signs
We all know that inflationary debt bubbles burst eventually
because central banks and governments understand the instability caused by
rampant leverage and speculation. By then it is too late, and the economy must
undergo a remedial recession to purge the malinvestments.
China’s highly leveraged economy has numerous risks that
would trigger a chain reaction throughout the entire system. The property
market, the commodity market, the currency market, the banking system and
leverage corporations form a powder keg that will soon find a spark.
When someone says, “China is immune”. What I hear them
saying is, “this time it’s different”. The same denials you hear when history
has proven that credit fuelled bubbles never last. You will always hear the
same bubble mantras that defy logic like, “property prices never go down” (US
sub-prime 2007), “earnings don’t matter” (Tech boom 2000), “they have a super-productive
economy and are different” (Japan 1990) etc. When central planning and debt is
involved, nothing ever changes and you can expect history to repeat again and
again and again.
![]() |
Source |